MSP to ABQ
I'm going from MSP to ABQ. I think I could make the drive in two very long days by stopping in Wichita the first night.
Now at Wichita there seems to be two options:
1) 35south to 40west (connect at OKC). Because 35 runs due south from Wichita to OKC it's a very indirect route. It seems that if I went this route, the distance might be too great to cover in one day.
2) Highway 54 to 40west (connect at Tucumcari, NM). This route is more direct as a matter of geography and cuts the actual distance down, but I don't know anything about long distance travels on non-interstates--does travel time go up due to a need for lower speed?
Is 54 a road with just one lane in each direction? Would I save any time by traveling 54 over I-35?
600 miles per day is normally when I start to hit the wall on a solo drive so I'm kind of intimidated by this one.. The reason I am hoping to do this drive in 2 days rather than 3 is that this is merely one leg of a larger road trip where I'm visiting friends in various cities. First, Chicago to MSP. Then to ABQ--since I don't know anyone in between those MSP & ABQ stops I want to cover that ground quick so I can spend more time elsewhere. After ABQ I'll head to PHX, then LA, then SFO. Should be great!
Thanks for the replies
Can of Corn
Welcome to the RTA Forum!
I'll first ease your mind a little by saying, I once during a solo trip made it from Sioux Falls to ABQ in 2 days, but I didn't leave SF until almost 6 pm on day one (drove until about 1am). I even added a couple hours of driving by taking a rather significant detour through the mountains of northern New Mexico, just for fun.
Unfortuantly, I went through Denver instead of Kansas, so I can't specifically say which of your two options is faster. I suspect your total travel time on US-54 will probably be pretty similar to sticking to the interstates. Since it is mostly 2 lanes and goes through some towns, you will not be able to travel as fast, but it will save you a good chunk of mileage.
Personally, I'd probably choose US-54, if for no other reason than it would provide a little variety to a trip with more than 1000 miles of interstates. I wouldn't expect it to save a lot of time, but it might save you a little bit, and if nothing else the shorter distance will mean a little less fuel used.
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts