7 Weeks across America - Realistic or Delusional?
Hi,
I am planning a 7 week roadtrip across america.
I want to:
begin in chicago (entire Route 66)
Las Vegas 3 to 4 days
National Parks
grand canyon ofcourse
San Francisco
entire Route 50
niagra falls
and finally new york city
i will be travelling all alone.
Begin: Mid July 2015
my total budget for 7 weeks is 8000$
have a look at the map i created.
https://www.google.com/maps/d/edit?m...k.k7ajHyeyxMJk
Am i somehow being delusional? or is it doable?
That makes a huge difference.
Air tickets from ???? (You did not mention that. I assumed you live in Chicago. Replies are always more accurate when we have the full picture.)
Why would you start in Chicago and finish on the east coast, thus incurring a possible one way drop fee of maybe many hundreds of dollars?
With flights and car rental you might want to adjust that budget. Think of $100 minimum per day, maybe more. Travelling alone is always more expensive.
Lifey
Some thoughts and alternatives
There is page on RTA dedicated to Route 66 here and this site in particular is a good one with 'turn by turn' maps in each State. I agree that one rental would most likely be the most cost effective, perhaps spending a couple of day in New York at either end of your trip. In SF there are a few Hotels that offer free parking a little way from the centre. One such area is around Lombard and Gough which is not far from Fishermans Wharf and the Cable cars into the City. One that offers reasonable value [for San Fran anyway] is the Buena Vista Motor Inn.
Personally speaking I think you will be dissapointed with the west rim after having seen the 'real thing' in the south rim NP area. It's nowhere near as spectacular and is not part of the NP system, it is more expensive and you are not allowed to take cameras on the Skywalk. Instead you could visit Monument Valley and I would also consider spending a few days travelling into southern Utah and Bryce canyon and Zion NP's. On the way back you should also consider visiting Arches and Canyonlands NP's near Moab just off I70/US50 and when you get to Montrose CO on US 50 take a couple of days to drive the spectacular 'San Juan Skyway'. This would take you through the wonderful mountain towns of Ouray and Silverton on the 'Million dollar Highway' to Durango. You would then drive towards Cortez and Mesa Verde NP before heading up to Dolores and to Telluride before driving to Ridgeway and back to Montrose. SPECTACULAR !!
One other thing, if you really wanted to drive route 66 'proper' then you really are missing an iconic section from Kingman through Needles to Santa Monica. You could track back from Vegas and then from Santa Monica spend a couple of days driving the spectacular coast highway around Big Sur to SF and then head inland to the mountains, either heading to Sequoia first or having the option to just visit the giant Sequoias at Maripose Grove in Yosemite. From Yosemite you would have the option of driving over the amazing Tioga Pass to Mono Lake and north to Lake Tahoe.
National Parks and Vegas in 7 Days?
Hello everybody,
You Guys are the experts. Please help me planning the following trip:
My Starting Point will be Flagstaff near Northern Arizona University, around 1st week of August and i would like to do the following:
Grand Canyon: just the South Rim, not the Skywalk
Monument Valley
Bryce
Zion
Las Vegas (3 full Days)
Hoover Dam
Death Valley
Sequoia & Kings (just for General Sherman - largest tree in the World)
Yosemite
Mono Lake
All this i will be doing in a rental midsize suv and i just want to see the most important things in all the above attractions.
Is all of this possible in 7 Days? 3 Days for Vegas and 4 Days for the Parks...
If Yes, in what order should i visit all of these attractions.
Am I being delusional with just 4 days for all the nature attractions? If Yes, how long is the absolute minimum?
Thanks
yeah, delusional might be right
Yeah, I'm sorry, but your plan isn't close to possible. Seeing all of these places, and just driving through Vegas would be tough in 7 days, giving up 3 of those days to spend in Vegas makes it just a non-starter. You'd almost need 4 full days on the road just to cover the miles, if all you did was stop to take picture of the park entry signs.
Are you not planning on doing your larger trip anymore?
I'll say this, pretty much all of the National Parks you're looking at really deserve a full day of your time, and it's tough to even see them at all in less than a half day. Sequoia, for example, will take you a few hours just to drive into the park, take a picture of Gen. Sherman, and drive back out.
Just to cover the miles on the shortest possible route - GC, MV, Bryce, Zion, Vegas (do Hoover Dam as a daytrip), Death Valley, Mono Lake (assuming Tioga Pass is open, you didn't say when you're traveling), Yosemite, and Sequoia - is 1500 miles, pretty much all on 2 lane roads. That's 3 hard days of driving by itself, and doesn't include any drive time from Sequoia onto your final destination, be it San Francisco, LA, Vegas, or back to Flagstaff.
So, when you take all the destinations you've listed, plus spending a few days in Vegas, I think you need at least 2 weeks for a quick trip. If you can't do that, then you'll have to start making some big, big cuts.
Yhe short answer is 'yes'.
Yes, with four days all you would be doing is driving straight through those parks, if you wanted to cover all of them. You would barely have time to get out of your vehicle to take a photo. Best you choose just a few of them. Some of those parks, such as Yosemite, it would take a couple of days to explore, and then you would not see all of it.
With four days, you could do a nice loop through the Grand Canyon, Monument Valley, Bryce and Zion, and even that would be rushed.
Lifey
Parks rather than routes.
Do you have the paper maps or a road atlas you were advised to get?
Quote:
how would you guys plan such a trip in 47 days?
Speaking just for myself, I would take at least one day from each city, and devote it to the parks. Once you've seen a couple of cities they all start to look the same, but the natural wonders of the west are unique. You will never see them anywhere else. When you get to the west, you may well regret having spent so much time in the concrete jungles.
You can drive from Chicago to Flagstaff in a much more efficient way than trying to follow a route which really no longer exists. Not only that, but you will end up seeing a lot more spectacular country. Check out the route from Chicago to Denver on I-80 to I-76 and then I-70 - the most scenic interstate in the country - to UT. You will then already be in the midst of the parks, and would be able to include Arches, Canyonlands and much more.
Rather than take 12 days, it would take about a third of the time.... freeing up at least 8 more days to spend in the parks.
From San Francisco to Chicago will not take you anywhere near 12 days, even if you follow part of US50, which does not go all the way to Chicago. That could free up even more time to spend in the south west.
Lifey
Routes, cities and parks?
Just to refresh, I have read your whole plan again, along with all the changes. I am glad Michael merged them.
Your plan is full of routes cities and parks. I think you need to decide which is your top priority, what exactly is it you want to get out of this trip. If it is the two routes, then drop some time in the cities, and do only those parks near the routes. (As one who has Jamie Jensen's book, I would suggest you not blindly follow it. He lists many attractions which may not necessarily be to your taste, on the other hand you may pass spots where you would rather spend time. Best design your own trip.)
If the priority is cities, then pick up your preferred routes when convenient, and skip the rest and visit which ever parks fit in time wise. And if the parks are top priority then adjust the other two to visit as many of the parks for as long as you can.
But you can't necessarily do it all, as I am sure you are beginning to see. However, as in previous posts, you have quite a lot of time swinging, which could be moved.
I would also suggest that you forget about the train to Chicago. Look at renting a car in Newark NJ. From what I have heard on the road from other visitors, it is cheaper to rent from Newark. Since you won't need a car in NY, you can pick it up and drop it off on your way out of and back into the city. There is a train between the two cities.
Quote:
my goal is to prepare a complete google map of my roadtrip, convert it into a format my gps software would understand so that i can just follow it.
This comment worries me more than a little. Be sure to travel with good paper maps, which on the road should be your primary navigational tool. Don't be tempted to rely solely on technology. Some have done so at their peril. By all means use a gps as a back up, but make sure you choose the roads, not the gps. Make sure you have those maps, and that you know how to read them.
Lifey
If that is what you want, it will work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GST
i planned 12 days because of all the road has to offer. i now have the ez66 guide and other route66 books. they show pretty nice attractions to visit...
the only cuts i can make are from the 2 routes. i don't really want to cut time from the cities.
How does 8 days per route sound?
That gives me 12 Days for the Parks..
This is the important part about a roadtrip. It has to go where you want to go.
I think your plan will work, especially if you visit some of the NPs when driving your chosen routes. I would still leave some flexibily for last minute change of mind.
Quote:
I will be having the Rand McNally Large Scale Atlas for Navigation but i still would like to have google maps as a backup. that is why i am still working on the kml file. And i promise it is just a backup.
The large scale is a bit bulky and heavy, but it is much easier to read. What I do with my Rand McNally to make it a souvenir of my trip, each night I sit down and hilight each and every road on which I travelled. It is great when you later look back over your trip, or when sharing with others. When I look through mine it is almost as if I am driving those roads again.
Have a great trip.
Lifey
Just one way to look at it.
You can still follow parts of route 66 after Flagstaff, there is Williams, Seligman and King man that can all be seen after the Grand canyon.
So if I am correct you have 31 days for the road trip out and back from Chicago including the National parks ? [not including 5 days in SF] Here is a rough sketch of what your trip could then look like.
Out.
Day 1. Chicago to Springfield IL.
Day 2 Springfield to St Louis.
Day 3. St Louis to Arcadia. [[Tulsa ?]
Day 4. to Oklahoma.
Day 5. Oklahoma to Amarillo.
Day 6 Amarillo to Albuquerque.
Day 7 Albu to Winslow.
Day 8. Winslow to Monument Valley.
Day 9 and 10. Grand canyon. [to Flagstaff]
Day11 Flagstaff to Williams/Seligman and Kingman.
Day 12 Kingman to Las Vegas via Hoover Dam.
Day 13 Las Vegas.
Day 14 Las Vegas to Bishop via Death valley.
Day 15 and 16 Yosemite.
Day 17 San Fran [5 days]
Back.
Day 18 SF to Lake Tahoe
Day 19 Lake Tahoe to Ely or Baker. [Great basin NP]
Day 20 Great Basin to Zion NP.
Day 21 Zion.
Day 22 Zion to Bryce canyon
Day 23 Bryce canyon to Capital Reef NP. [UT scenic 12]
Day 24 CR [Torrey] to Moab UT
Day 25 Arches and Canyonlands. [Moab UT]
Day 26 Moab to Durango CO [Mesa Verde NP?]
Day 27 Durango to Montrose. Million dollar Highway. [Silverton and Ouray on way]
Day 28 Montrose to Canon City. [Black canyon, Currecanti Nat res, Monarch pass, Royal Gorge bridge]
Day 29 Canon City to Dodge City.
Day 30 Dodge City to Kansas City.
Day 31 back to Chicago
This gives you all your time in the City's and some breath taking National parks and scenic drives. Of course this is just a quick and rough guide to what is possible and will hopefully give you something to work with and then adjust as needed to suit your own personal goals.