"Sedenquist's Rule of Serial Consequences"
Some folks think that road trips are just accidents waiting to happen. On this Forum, we make a point of showing the pitfalls and the thrills of road trips. In my latest MSNBC column I propose a way of planning for getting out of scary or otherwise dangerous situations.
I would like to know what you think of this concept.
Thanks,
Mark
And True Across Disciplines
We also see this over and over again in flying accidents, where a given crash is almost never the result of a single bad decision or equipment malfunction, but the result of successive poor choices that each reduce the margin of error until there is none left, and the last 'straw', that would have been almost inconsequential in its own right, cements the downward spiral. I don't know that I'd ever put a 'magic number' on the number of bad decisions needed to end in tragedy, but rather the pilot or driver in command must be aware that he or she is always making decisions that affect the safety of the trip and that in each decision, they should be looking to optimize their margin of safety and maximize the number of options still available to them. I think this is also one of the basic concepts taught in Defensive Driving where the driver is always looking for his 'out' option(s) in the event the other driver does the incredibly stupid, because while he won't always, he will eventually.
AZBuck
Was this a personal memory?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
lhuff
A tax return where the accountant agreed to add a few questionable deductions can lead to a lawsuit and an IRS investigation.
I met with our CPA team today -- good folks --
Another and so-preventable tragedy in DV
This article in today's LA Times makes me heartsick.
A young woman and her son headed out overland in a jeep with little water, no maps, virtually no food and became trapped in deep sand off the highway. Latest information is that she was traveling on a road she'd never researched and relying on GPS receiver for navigation.
The 11-year old boy died a day before the search party could find them. They were stranded in the desert for five days!
So sad. So unnecessary.
Mark
****The link to the LA Times article is no longer valid (April 2023)***
What sort of camping gear?
There are so many unanswered questions from this event -- but one of them has got to be -- what kind of camping gear did they have with them? This was supposed to be the start of camping trip. Doesn't really sound like they had enough food on board.
One of the conditions of the "Sedenquist Rule of Serial Consequences" is that every two poor choices could have been reversed by one good decision -- Sadly too many poor decision led to the tragic result.
It's been a tough year in the park this year -- with three recorded deaths -- from under-prepared park visitors.
Mark
Don't trust your eyes -- just follow mapping app!
Another example of someone ignoring common sense and blindly following a mapping program. From CNN today:
A woman driving in Forest Grove, Ore., ended up stuck in waist-deep water after following Google Maps down a road closed due to flooding.
Forest Grove Fire and Rescue responded to Southwest Fernhill Road, between Highway 47 and Geiger Road, on Monday morning.
Firefighters said the road was clearly marked as closed with signs, but the 46-year-old woman continued driving as far as she could on it, roughly a quarter of a mile past the barricade. read more here...
Faulty brains are a reality too
I dunno, I've seen people who believed everything they read in a newspaper and now many seem to award Google Maps with a god-like knowledge. I especially dislike Google Maps when it is correct and my memory about a certain route is faulty!
Mark