San Francisco to Crater Lake
I have to drive from San Francisco to Crater Lake with my husband and another couple and it's about 7 hours according to Mapquest. Now, taking I-5 is surely the quick way, but would it be a mistake to miss driving through the Redwoods up past Eureka? We will have already driven the coast from San Diego to L.A., but is it worth it to take an extra 3.5 hours (10 hours total driving one day) to see the Redwoods?
I was thinking San Fran to Crescent City so we could see the Redwoods and then over to Fort Klamath near Crater Lake. I could also go San Fran to Redding and then cut across 299 to Arcata and up to Crescent City, as I've heard that 299 is absolutely gorgeous. Is it too much?
I have two nights booked in Frisco!!!
I can't stay at or near Crescent City. If I left Frisco at like 7 am could I see the Redwoods and get to Crater Lake in 1 day?
Pashit is the ultimate authority on this one!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbi Lou
If I left Frisco at like 7 am could I see the Redwoods and get to Crater Lake in 1 day?
Pashnit is an expert motorcyclist (who has been known to drive a tweeny-weeny bit above the posted speed limits). If he couldn't cover this distance on his jet-fueled two-wheeler, there is no way you can travel it faster in a car...
Mark
How far is The Avenue of the Giants from SF?
I want to see the Avenue of the Giants during the day, so when should I leave to see it during the day? Also, if I go to the Avenue of the Giants where should I stay after that so I can A) still drive the 299 and B) get close enough to stay somewhere that limits the drive to Crater Lake?