First time road trip- confused about camping...?
My best friend and I are driving down from North Jersey to Galveston, TX to camp on the beach next weekend. Its our first road trip and we thought we would be spontaneous. However, I'm more on the planner side. I'm looking up camping sites and I'm getting confused about the whole tent camping and RV campgrounds. Are they the same? Are they separate?
Obviously not a big camper...could use some common sense advice.
Thanks!
Does the word trespass ring a bell?
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAphin
I'm also curious; I prefer camping on plots of land that don't appear to be owned by anyone in particular. Campgrounds aren't really my thing... It kind of defeats the purpose of camping to me if you have to pay for a spot. What are the rules of thumb for camping like that?
Unless the land in question is "owned" by the Federal or state government then it is probably owned by a private person and you would be trespassing. Rule of thumb is don't, without obtaining permission from the land owner. I am not sure I have ever seen a parcel of land that is not "owned" by someone in the lower 48 states. Where have you seen such places?
Mark
Finding Federal or State Public lands
On the public lands, typically BLM-managed, you can often camp in "dispersed" areas (meaning outside of developed campgrounds). The trick is finding out where those are. Keep in mind that just because it IS public land, doesn't also mean that camping is always allowed.
You can buy maps that use different shading colors to identify public lands (the state Gazetteers are one example). Once you find them on the map, you can contact the controlling agency to find out if camping is allowed and what the rules are. Often there will be fire restrictions, for example.
As Mark said, camping on private lands is a bad idea -- at minimum, you may be asked by law enforcement to move in the middle of the night. Bob
Ah... how far civilization has advanced
Quote:
Originally Posted by UGAphin
See, I figure that up until maybe a few thousand years ago, we were living at primitive campsites anyways. I am not especially fond of the concept of someone 'owning' the woods.
First... even in the primitive times you speak of, humans were territorial. You got too close to someone's territory and they didn't like you being there, lets just say your head got quickly aquainted with their club.
Most of the 'Woods' you speak of is that way because someone took the time to leave that place in its natural state. If they didn't 'Own' those woods, a developer would truck in his bulldozers, level the whole place, and build another starbucks!
Quote:
It should be everyones. That is how it used to be. ...Of course I respect trespassing signs, but if they aren't there, I say the land is free for camping. Its not like I'm going to build a house or claim the land for Spain or something.
Even in Washington State, with its Public Access law, most people actually take the time to live there for the full 5 years to make sure. Its one thing for a 10 year old and his friends to get caught playing "Rambo" there, but for a bunch of college kids... the police and land owners don't exactly like that. Yeah, they may just ask you nicely to leave... but remember, there are those out there who do their talking with a shotgun and buckshot when it comes to tresspassing.
Point is, when traveling... play it safe. Use designated campgrounds, federal lands, or NPS/USFS Backcountry (or Mark's Forest Service roadsides... I still don't know how he does it!). Sleeping on someone elses woods just because you want to get back to nature... well, that might get you aquainted with the modern equivelent of that club I mentioned before.
From one young person to another... use some common sense.
-Brad M.